Toxics
Why Do Smells Make Some People Sick?
I thought this was an interesting article, relevent to our topic of toxics.
Science Daily: Why Do Smells Make Some People Sick?
It seems that people who do not do well with odors have a different pattern of brain activity and blood flow through the brain that those who can smell the same odor and have no reaction.
Regardless, I say if it's toxic, we shouldn't be smelling it.
organic dry cleaning
hi debra,
please enlighten us on the validity of "organic dry cleaning". i have gone to several different storefronts for my dry cleaning and they have written signs saying "organic dry cleaning" and have verbally confirmed to me that fact also. how do i know if it's really organic or are they all (i have seen at least 20 so far) breaking the law by lying? and to what extent, technically, is this dry cleaning "organic"?
Well, first of all there is no such thing as "organic" dry cleaning. It's a misuse of the word.
When used with regard to food and fibers, "organic" has a very specific definition, and very specific rules must be followed to legally use that term.
No such definitions exist for dry cleaning.
I think some people are using the term in general to mean their dry cleaning does not use toxic chemicals. And there are some dry cleaning methods, such as using a food-grade level of carbon dioxide, which are nontoxic. But don't at all assume that because a sign says "organic dry cleaning" that they are using nontoxic methods.
Here is a post I wrote before outlining the different dry cleaning methods and their toxicity: Q&A: Help Me Find A Green Dry Cleaner
Read more: http://www.thedailygreen.com/going-green/latest/812#ixzz1gIpHeJDM
California Working on New Law to Trim Toxics
California is moving toward sweeping new rules to reduce toxic chemicals in cleaning products, cosmetics, electronics, toys and possibly many other consumer goods.
The newly proposed Safer Consumer Products Regulations is now being debated, with a target to have a final form in late 2012.
In 1986, Proposition 65 was passed, requiring products that contain chemicals known to cause cancer to carry warning labels. These new regulations will in addition require manufacturers to phase out toxic chemicals or face fines of $25,000 per day.
California Pioners Plan for Trimming Toxins
I want to comment on my own post here.
I am completely in favor of less toxic chemicals, as you all know.
But I am actually sad to see that such stringent laws are required in our society.
There is such a thing as ethics, which, simply put, is "doing the right thing." And the right thing includes doing things in ways that support and sustain life instead of damaging it.
It is entirely possible to make toxic free products. There are thousands of companies doing so already, based on their own personal ethics to "do the right thing." Many of them are listed on Debra's List, and I add more all the time.
What I would like to see is more ethics in our world, not more regulations. Information on the toxic effects of chemicals should be made more widely known, and manufacturers should—by their own choice—decide not to use them.
But...when people don't do the right thing to sustain life for all, society does need to have regulations.
I just wanted to say that I think it is within each of us to naturally choose to do the right thing, and that we all have an inherent desire to live. If everyone would find that within themselves, and this were the operating principle for all businesses as well as consumers, we would have a toxic free world.
Oh, I've got an idea! The regulation could require that all business do business in a way that sustains life. That would be a fine regulation!
Toxic Exposures from Wood Smoke
![]()
MARY J. ROZENBERG - CLEAN AIR REVIVAL A one-hour interview with Mary J. Rozenberg, President of Clean Air Revival. For more than 25 years she has been working to educate the public about how wood smoke is toxic and can affect our health. Yes, that's woodstoves, fireplaces, bar-b-cues, campfires, and more... |
Last week a concerned reader sent some information to me about particulate toxicity from wood smoke, asking me to publish it. Below are her words unedited.
I commend you on your work. An issue that many are afraid to bring to the forefront and that is seriously affecting our health and quality of life is the health effects of wood smoke. It’s similar to the smoking and second-hand smoke issue, in that, although government-funded research studies showed it was harming the public health, it took a very long time for legislation banning it to be enacted. Interestingly, the government has a multitude of studies identifying the harmful and serious effects of wood smoke, but offers tax credits to those who install wood burning stoves. The movie “Thank You For Smoking” is a great example of corporations and government doing what is in their best interest, not ours.
In my neighborhood in Ann Arbor, MI, there has been an increase in wood burning in the last two years, and the neighborhood often smells like a campground. Compounded with this are University of Michigan tailgaters invading the city with barbeque grills and portable firepits. Last year I experienced the effects of neighbors’ wood smoke (burning, watery eyes; continuous coughing; headaches; loss of appetite), as did the six year old little girl next door, whose mother had to take her to the emergency room in the middle of the night for a breathing treatment.
Henri Chero, an environmental engineer in Montreal, told me smoke particulate is so small that you can’t keep it out, no matter how airtight your home is. Also, recently in the news, was an article about young children in a town near Sandusky, Ohio, experiencing high rates of leukemia. It is a rural area, and I suspect there are many wood burning appliances being used as an economical measure. Although the article stated that air quality testing had been done, was it done at night and on weekends, when there is likely more burning occurring, and over a prolonged period? In my own state, there has also been an increase in children’s cancer rates in the Marine City area. While polluted water is suspected, what might be the synergistic effect of contaminated water combined with exposure to wood smoke particulate?
Many people enjoy burning wood, whether it’s for ambience or to supplement the heating of their homes, so to restrict it is not a popular issue. However, there are gas fire pits and fireplaces available that would not be as dangerous to our health. People see wood as a renewable resource, but wood smoke is polluting our air, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions, and seriously affecting the public health. Wood burning is not essential to life; breathing clean air is.
Following is some of the research and related information on this topic:
The American Lung Association says: “MORE THAN 90% OF THE WOODSMOKE PARTICLE MASS CONSISTS OF FINE PARTICLES, THE FRACTION OF PM THAT MANY RESEARCHERS CONSIDER TO HAVE THE GREATEST ASSOCIATION WITH ADVERSE HEALTH OUTCOMES.IN ADDITION TO FINE PM, WOODSMOKE EMISSIONS CONTAIN COMPONENTS SUCH AS CARBON MONOXIDE (AN ASPHYXIANT), VARIOUS IRRITANT GASES SUCH AS NITROGEN DIOXIDE, SULFUR DIOXIDE, HYDROCHLORIC ACID, AND ALDEHYDES SUCH AS FORMALDEHYDE AND ACROLEIN, AND CHEMICALS KNOWN OR SUSPECTED TO BE CARCINOGENS, SUCH AS POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHs), OXYGENATED PAHs, AND POLYCHLORINATED DIOXINS AND FURANS.”
Another research article states: 'Twice as many women with breast cancer had high PAH Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, (a by-product of wood smoke) levels in their BREAST TUMORS compared with tissue of women without breast cancer.’ Also important to note:Health effects from particulate matter occur after exposures of 2-4 hours or less in duration of woodsmoke at the 12-29mcg range (Koenig et al. 1993).
Excerpted from: the Burning Issue, Box 1045, Point Arena CA 95468 Tel: 707-882-3601,URL: http://burningissues.org
The smoke from your fire can seriously pollute your neighborhood's air for several hours. In fact, during periods when the wind is still, the hazardous particles and gases in smoke can accumulate to harmful levels for days. Ironically, backyard burning often occurs during calm weather, when the smoke can't be dispersed — and on the weekend, when many people are out for a "breath of fresh air." Running inside and closing the doors and windows won't protect you, since smoke easily seeps through small cracks and holes.
Fine particulates are small enough to be breathed into the deepest reaches of our lungs. They are associated with all sorts of health problems — from a runny nose and coughing, to bronchitis, asthma, emphysema, pneumonia, and even death. Senior citizens, infants and people who already have lung or heart problems are most at risk, but healthy younger adults and children can also be affected.
Particulate pollution is the most important contaminant in our air. ...we know that when particle levels go up, people die. A number of studies also show changes in inflammatory markers in the blood, which are risk factors for heart attack." Joel Schwartz, Ph.D., Harvard School of Public Health, E Magazine, Sept. /Oct. 2002.
50% of the polynuclear organic material (POM) in our air is from residential burning. POMs contain the subgroup PAH. PAHs include benzo(a) pyrene and other known carcinogenic compounds.(In-House Performance of New Technology Wood Stoves, EPA/600/D-90/026)
Wood Smoke/Black Carbon Soot: a Major Cause ofGlobal Warming http://www.bothnews.com/849/wood-smokeblack-carbon-soot-a-major-cause-of...
The US EPA warns that exposure to a fraction of a nanogram of PAH increases our risk of developing cancer. (Wood Burning Fireplaces: Romance or Risk, BioScience Vol. 32 No 2, February, 1982)
The EPA estimates that the lifetime cancer risk from wood stove smoke is twelve times greater than that from an equal volume of second hand tobacco smoke. (The Health Effects of Wood Smoke, Washington State Department of Ecology); (b)"Burning two cords of wood produces the same amount of mutagenic particles as: Driving 13 gasoline powered cars 10,000 miles each at 20 miles/gallon or driving 2 diesel powered cars 10,000 miles each @ 30 miles/gallon.
I have spent countless (over100) hours contacting various local and national governmental agencies, politicians, journalists, and local television stations about this issue--all to no avail. My own city (Ann Arbor, MI) would not enforce its Air Quality or Nuisance ordinances when my husband's and my health were being affected two years ago by a neighbor's illegal wood stove. Unfortunately, four individuals on our two-block street have been diagnosed with cancer (two have died) within the last two years. These individuals are/were in their early fifties to early sixties. It seems statistically significant that these diagnoses/deaths coincided with the increase in wood smoke particulate in our neighborhood. As a result, my husband and I are planning to sell our home and move away from Ann Arbor.
It is sad that you can follow a healthy lifestyle, yet still have your health jeopardized by other individuals and not be able to do anything about it (not everyone can move). Burning Issues is an organization with a wealth of information on this subject, but they haven't received the national attention needed to address this issue.
I don't want to get breast or some other cancer/disease because a neighbor(s) wants to burn wood. People might think wood stoves save money, but at what cost to their and others health? I am disappointed that our govt. allows our health to be jeopardized by known environmental pollutants, especially when it is so concerned about health care costs.
waterbeds
Would like to know if anyone has any information on how safe waterbeds are. Including any and all information.....such as magnetic fields, molds, chemicals used to keep mold away in mattress parts, heater safety in regards to body, mattress itself, etc......
thank you so much!
Krissie
Readers? I haven't researched waterbeds in detail since so much plastic is involved.
Are Japanese Products Safe?
The teribly tragic disaster in Japan is still ongoing with recent reports of leaking still occuring.
With all this going on for so long and not likely to stop anytime soon, I've never seen any info about how safe Japanese products are. At the moment we are in need of buying a television and computer. Japan I believe makes alot of components that also are used in different companies. Knowing how secretlive the Japanese goverment has been with their own people, and how corporations are unlikely to be honest as well-- has anyone seen anything about this? Can anyone recommend makers of tv's, computers, cars and other electronics that would be safe?
Sad to say this is a reality we may be dealing with for some time to come. Safety of products need to be addressed.
I haven't seen anything on this.
The first thing that comes to mind is that there are probably a lot of products made in Japan already in the marketplace that were manufactured prior to the nuclear disaster.
And second, while I totally agree that safety of products needs to be addressed, in fact, we live in a world where they are not. Our best bet is to both do our best to choose the least toxic products AND make sure our bodies are in good shape to efficiently remove the toxic chemicals we are exposed to. This is my viewpoint in my new book Toxic Free, which gives a lot of information on how to do just this.
In addition, you might want to take a look at my article Protect Your Health from Radiation.
Pesticides & Diabetes
According to the Journal of Diabetes Care (August 4, 2011) exposure to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) has been associated with the prevalence of type 2 diabetes.
A study was done that found that the participants with the highest exposure to oxychlordane, trans-nonachlor, 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis-(p-chlorophenyl)-ethylene (p,p'-DDE, and polychlorinated biphenyl 153, the risk of type 2 diabetes was 1.64-2.24 times higher than that among individuals with the lowest exposure (P(lin) = 0.003-0.050.
In another analysis, the associations between type 2 diabetes and oxychlordane and trans-nonachlor were strongest among the overweight participants. Exposure to 2,2',4,4'-tetrabromodiphenyl ether (BDE 47) and 2,2',4,4',5,5'-hexabromodiphenyl ether (BDE 153) was not associated with type 2 diabetes.
The study concluded that there was an association between type 2 diabetes and adult-only exposure to organochlorine pesticides in a general urban population.
Association between type 2 diabetes and exposure to persistent organic pollutants
Nord Piano Keybed lubricant
Hi Debra, Thanks for your site!
I recently purchased a Nord piano that has a Fatar keybed made in Tunisia and they are using some kind of chemical on it that I am reacting to. I chose this piano because it was made without plywood (unlike most other major brands) so was very surprised and disappointed that there was an issue with it. My choices now are to get a Roland keyboard that has the plywood or get a used Nord that has gassed off for 6-8 mos or more.
My biggest question is will the used Nord, even though it may not smell as bad still be insidiously effecting me ? I would have to have it shipped across the country to even tell if I can tolerate it. I have played a Roland and even though it has the plywood, I did not notice a reaction to it. I did not buy it because even though I couldn't smell it, I figured it must be gassing off formaldehyde. Perhaps someone knows of a digital piano/keyboard that has no plywood? Thanks for any thoughts you or your readers have.
Readers, and suggestions?
Cellulite, Acne and Fluoride
A reader sent me a link to a very interesting website about reducing cellulite deposits on your body. Among other causes of cellulite, the author of the site mentioned fluoride.
Apparently she made this connection after she learned she had a condition known as fluoroderma, which is acne caused by fluoride exposure.
Read more about this at Cellulite and the Fluoride Connection (there's also a link to another page about how to do a fluoride detox to remove fluoride from your body).
Even BPA-Free Plastic Not Always Safe
"BPA-Free" is a popular buzzword these days, but a new study shows it's more hype than help.
Scientists conducted lab tests on more than 20 top-brand baby bottles and more than 450 plastic food and beverage-packages and found virtually all leached chemicals that acted like the hormone estrogen, even though many were free of BPA. These chemicals—called endocrine disruptors—falsely tell the body's cells that the hormone estrogen is around, potentially causing all sorts of troubling developmental and reproductive consequences.
Baby bottles, plastic bags, plastic wrap, clamshell food containers, stand-up pouches...just about all plastic food and beverage containers were found to contain chemicals that have estrogenic effects.
Researchers bought hundreds of plastic food and beverage containers at Target, Wal-Mart, Trader Joe's, Whole Foods and other major retailers. More than 90 percent of the products leached estrogenic chemicals before they were even put through stresses
The paper noted that some of the chemicals that are used to replace BPA have been shown to have even more estrogenic activity than BPA does.
his Q&A blog is open for all to participate. Feel free to ask your own questions and answer questions posted by others. I know all of you have a wealth of information and experience on healthy living and you are welcome to share it here. 


















